🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to set the political agenda, according to a new research carried out in Germany.

Researchers found that this trend has unwittingly helped radical parties by validating their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The findings, published in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core subjects like integration and migration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to voters that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when mainstream parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to apply to countries throughout Europe.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," said another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a then national leader called for widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be observed throughout Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.

This has created an echo chamber that was inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Some parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline platform of the radical right, even as studies suggests that this approach drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered showed that the influence of far-right groups had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a co-author. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the need for mainstream parties to carve out their distinct narratives, especially on topics such as migration and assimilation, instead of continuously following the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be heard."